Awizard & Fotomagique have pretty much nailed it. I would add a couple of thoughts: look for a fresh approach; if it has been done a zillion times, ask what makes our image sufficiently different to be accepted. This might be a reason not to take the photo or do so for our personal albums rather than stock. Secondly there are times when it is still okay to take the photo; this can be a learning experience to see how an idea or subject translates into a photo. If we're discovering how an effect/look/style was achieved this may help us as photographers, though it doesn't mean the images ought to be submitted. The trick is to evaluate whether or not we have successfully captured the story or look, learn from it and think of other ways to create images/illustrations that can help designers and be successful. I often take pictures where the subject matter intrigues me and I want to take advantage of the moment. I ask myself how the image could be used, what do I envision and does it work. If I don't think they're viable on their own, I may keep them for textures or other types of layers for future compositions. Others get binned. I've often done keyword searches to see if a concept has already been done before taking any photos, then see if my idea offers a fresh approach; I've also found subjects of interest for which there aren't many images and then strive to provide ones that speak to both our passion as a photographers and the commercial needs of the buyer. So there are times when it may be best not to take the photo, or to take it and then see whether it is stock-worthy. Hope this helps! Cheers for now... posted in When you must not take pictures
Ein Teil der Übersetzung erfolgt durch ein automatisches System und kann
Fehler enthalten.